More

    Judge denies American women’s soccer immediate appeal

    A federal judge has denied a request by American women’s soccer players to allow an immediate appeal of his decision to throw out their claim of unequal pay against the U.S. Soccer Federation.

    U.S. District Judge R. Gary Klausner in Los Angeles has scheduled a trial for Sept. 15 on the players’ remaining claim of discriminatory work conditions.

    Lawyers for the women had asked him to enter a final judgment on his decision to dismiss the pay claim, which would have allowed them to take the case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

    ”The granting of an immediate appeal will not eliminate the possibility of two trials or the possibility of successive appeals involving interlocking facts,” Klausner wrote Tuesday. ”The court has declined the parties’ request to stay trial pending the resolution of any appeal. And should a jury render a verdict unfavorable to plaintiffs on their remaining claims, there is no reason to think plaintiffs will not appeal that decision.”

    Klauser ruled May 1 the women could not prove discrimination over pay and granted in part the USSF’s motion for a partial summary judgment. He said the union for the women’s national team rejected an offer to be paid under the same pay-to-play structure as the men’s national team’s collective bargaining agreement and the women accepted guaranteed salaries and greater benefits along with a different bonus structure.

    He also refused to let go to trial allegations the women were discriminated against because they played more games on artificial turf.

    NFL Betting

    Klausner left intact claims the USSF discriminated in its use of charter aircraft, and in the money it spent on commercial airfare, hotel accommodations, and medical and training support services.

    ”One way or another, we intend to appeal the court’s decision which does not account for the central fact in this case that women players have been paid at lesser rates than men who do the same job,” Molly Levinson, a spokeswoman for the players, said in a statement.

    ”Tonight’s ruling simply means that an appeal may take longer to file and is a reminder that we must not give up our efforts both on and off the field to fight injustice,” Levinson said. ”Though we face significant challenges, we are strengthened by the reality that our effort is one part of the greater movement for equality happening in our country right now.”

    New USSF President Cindy Parlow Cone – a former national team player – has said she hopes a settlement can be reached. The current collective bargaining agreement expires on Dec. 31, 2021.

    Players sued in March 2018 under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and they asked for more than $66 million in damages.

    More AP soccer: https://apnews.com/Soccer and https://twitter.com/AP-Sports

    Source link news

    Related articles

    Comments

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Betting on Soccer

    Share article

    Latest articles

    Predicted Liverpool XI to face Brentford

    3 minute read 25/9/2021 | 02:05pm Liverpool will be aiming to keep...

    Maldini: “This feeling is indescribable, I’m yet to fully realize it, the good thing is we brought home the three points” | Rossoneri Blog

    Daniel Maldini celebrating during Spezia-Milan at Stadio Alberto Picco on September 25, 2021. (@imago-images)Daniel Maldini was overjoyed after scoring on his...

    Moyes reveals what makes West Ham star ‘special’ after ‘deserved’ win

    David Moyes felt his West Ham side deserved all three points from their clash with Leeds and believes he has a ‘special’ player in...

    Ex-Rochdale and non league player sent to 28 YEARS in prison

    An ex-Rochdale and non league player has been sent to 28 YEARS in prison for raping and sexually assaulting seven females. 23 year old Jonathan...
    Betting on Soccer

    Newsletter

    Subscribe to stay updated.